Steve Kirsch and I support Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and find consensus on how paid media is discrediting the scientists

And a glimpse into my own censorship sandwich

It was an honor to speak this past weekend in San Mateo with Steve Kirsch and Edward Dowd at one of the most successful CHD fundraisers in the history of CHD California.

It was also great for me to have time over dinner to meet Steve and share a bit of our intersecting stories.

Sunday, Steve shared in his substack a tactic I know all too well.

As Steve Summarizes from his recent substack and as the DailyMail article explains, “When you cannot win your argument on the scientific merits, you must resort to paying people to censor or smear your opposition.”

When smearing or censoring doesn’t work, another tacit they have utilized is simply changing the definition. This is why on this substack I am passionate about the preservation of institutional memory - and why words matter.

At the 6:30 mark, as Tucker Carlson says regarding Fauci’s response to gain of function when confronted by congress, ‘Well, it sounds a lot like the gain-of-function research you read about, the research that was occurring at the Wuhan lab just before COVID broke out of the lab and overturned the world and wrecked the U.S. economy. That was the research that Tony Fauci lied about under oath. As The Intercept has reported: “Scientists working under a 2014 NIH grant to the EcoHealth Alliance to study bat coronaviruses combine the genetic material from a parent coronavirus known as WIV1 with other viruses." Seven virologists told The Intercept that the research "appears to meet NIH's criteria for gain-of-function research.”’ 

On 2009 OCT 23, our paper, Detection of a Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, was published in Science the Journal.

What happened over the next two years was a series of strategically written and paid for articles in both Science the Journal and its sister publication, Science Insider, which slowly and methodically dismantled my work and most importantly the existence of XMRVs (Xenotropic murine leukemia virus–related virus) and its potential to both explain and offer cures for our current host of autoimmune diseases.

As one of the users from Phoenix Rising, the Largest ME/CFS Community Forum points out in February of 2011, “Agency heads are scared to death of how the patient population will react if XMRV works out.”

What does that mean? If it ‘works out’? It’s a question the journalists and paid scientists from the journal Science did not want to have anyone even ask. What happens if it works out - the question of the current host of Vaccine-AIDS autoimmune diseases and cancer since the very first gain of function - HIV.

The targeted takedown began the same day my paper was published, 2009 Oct 23rd, a science OpEd where John Coffin and Jonathan Stoye -   A New Virus for Old Diseases? | Science A retrovirus associated with cancer is linked to chronic fatigue syndrome.

And why after such an important discovery? Because it wasn't one new virus how many old diseases — it was how many new viruses have we created and injected in every vaccine since all liability was removed in 1986.

Over the next two years, there was a slow drip of paid and deliberate discredit action, oped articles and ‘scientific studies’ that chipped away the footprint of our important discovery.

On June 22nd of 2011, the  Absence of XMRV Retrovirus and Other Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Viruses in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome was released in the Journal of Virology.

On December 21st of 2011, Science issued a full retraction of my 2009 paper — retracted because I was falsely arrested as a felony fugitive from Justice — a fugitive from Fauci Justice, Fauci and his 40 year plague of corruption and the explosion of chronic disease because of mouse-monkey-cow-pig-aborted-human infections-by-injection in a soup of chemical toxins.